Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change

comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

Are you sure that chunking the strings is where your performance bottleneck is? Have you profiled? Could IO be a more significant constraint to execution time? I only ask because it doesn't seem like the performance of substr for 10,000,000 strings is all that bad for the problem domain.

If this section of code is really significant, here's a comparison of the valid solutions provided up to this point in the thread. Naturally unpack wins. It's only a few seconds slower in 10,000,000 iterations than the "control" case (which isn't a solution, but just a check to see what the framework for each solution costs).

use strict; use warnings; use Benchmark qw/timethese/; # Test/Benchmark parameters. $main::string = q/CTTCGAATT/; our $time = 10000000; my $subs_to_test = { substr => \&by_substr, match => \&by_match, unpack => \&by_unpack, control => \&control, }; # Benchmark. timethese( $time, $subs_to_test ); # Subs being benchmarked. sub control { my @substrings; @substrings = qw/CTT CGA ATT/; return \@substrings; } sub by_substr { my $position = 0; my @substrings; while( $position < length $main::string ) { push @substrings, substr( $main::string, $position, 3 ); $position += 3; } return \@substrings; } sub by_match { my @substrings; while( $main::string =~ m/(...)/sg ) { push @substrings, $1; } return \@substrings; } sub by_unpack { my @substrings; @substrings = unpack( '(a3)*', $main::string ); return \@substrings; }

Here's the output.

Benchmark: timing 10000000 iterations of control, match, substr, unpac +k... control: 5 wallclock secs ( 5.65 usr + 0.00 sys = 5.65 CPU) @ 17 +69911.50/s (n=10000000) match: 22 wallclock secs (21.12 usr + 0.00 sys = 21.12 CPU) @ 47 +3484.85/s (n=10000000) substr: 12 wallclock secs (11.88 usr + 0.00 sys = 11.88 CPU) @ 84 +1750.84/s (n=10000000) unpack: 8 wallclock secs ( 9.04 usr + 0.00 sys = 9.04 CPU) @ 11 +06194.69/s (n=10000000)

By the way: This question was crossposted to StackOverflow here.


In reply to Re: Fast Way to Split String in to Chunk of Equal Length by davido
in thread Fast Way to Split String in to Chunk of Equal Length by neversaint

Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":

  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (7)
    As of 2020-04-04 23:22 GMT
    Find Nodes?
      Voting Booth?
      The most amusing oxymoron is:

      Results (33 votes). Check out past polls.