Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re: formatting spoilers

by QM (Parson)
on Mar 22, 2004 at 04:53 UTC ( [id://338548]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to formatting spoilers

Can you put your spoiler on your scratch pad, and provide a link to it in your reply?

-QM
--
Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: formatting spoilers
by allolex (Curate) on Mar 22, 2004 at 05:04 UTC

    Linking to spoilers on the scratch pad doesn't work too well because our scratch pads are really designed to be temporary. We want the nodes to be generating content as permanent as possible in the Internet--for our posterity, you know... ;)

    --
    Allolex

Re: Re: formatting spoilers
by QM (Parson) on Mar 22, 2004 at 05:20 UTC
    Yes, so right.

    Then perhaps we should start a node called Spoilers, and just post our spoilers there as a reply, and link to it in the original thread.

    Maybe we should have another section added, called Spoilers, but not easy to get to.

    -QM
    --
    Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of

      Allolex suggested I share this with the group:

      If there is a root node called Spoilers, where all spoilers live separate from the original thread, each spoiler "answer" can have comments and replies, which will not show up in the original thread. This keeps all spoiler related discussion tucked neatly away behind links.

      Allolex points out that this departs from the SOP where one root node "contains" the entire discussion. I assume this comes from some ideal of displaying the root node and reading the entire discussion just with a mouse-wheel -- of somehow encapsulating a discussion into a glass box for all to see at a glance.

      I would counter that many threads have links outside the original thread. In fact, in a heavy response thread, beyond some threshold responses are hidden behind links anyway.

      <tongue-in-cheek>What are browsers for?</tongue-in-cheek> :)

      -QM
      --
      Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of

        There were several critiques that appeared only in the ChatterBox, and I only managed to observe a small sample of them. With the aim of wider discourse, I'll attempt to repeat them here. [Feel free to add/correct.]

        1) To post a spoiler, 2 nodes will need to be created.

        2) The spoiler topic would be huge.

        3) The spoiler topic would have a lot of unrelated info in it.

        4) Spoiler nodes would show up in searches. [I'm ambivalent on this point. Yes, spoiler nodes would show up. Would they be relevant? Are any other search hits relevant?]

        I must say I'm concerned that lots of useful info is tossed around in the ChatterBox about existing posts, and never captured. This node is my attempt to mitigate that situation.

        -QM
        --
        Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://338548]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-19 22:12 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found