![]() |
|
No such thing as a small change | |
PerlMonks |
RE: threaded discussion maybe? (box utilization)by ybiC (Prior) |
on Sep 29, 2000 at 05:38 UTC ( [id://34550]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Something like this was proposed a while back, japhy, and it sounded good to me. If I remember right, the request was for a "jump to top of thread" link on each and every reply node, but that it would add humongously to box utilization (and to response times), so was shot down.
I'm no DB guru, but suspect your idea might have the same show-stopping drawback. If I'm wrong, doubtless some fine Monk will set the record straight. 8^) If I can dig up the thread, I'll add an Update:
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|