Re: Red Perl part I

Well, it doesn't "fail" per se for me, but I think that I am too thick to understand the output:

The
hmneede
[download]

Using Fedora Core 1, perl 5.8.3. I just hit "download code" and ran it...

Comment on Re: Red Perl part I Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Red Perl part I by ysth (Canon) on May 02, 2004 at 08:44 UTC
That's strange; if you run it with warnings on, what do you see? What does this say? `print join ":", map ord, split //, <DATA>;__DATA__ .W&fKq` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re: Re: Re: Red Perl part I by mpolo (Chaplain) on May 02, 2004 at 14:25 UTC
Here's the output under perl -w `Argument "*" isn't numeric in array element at index.pl line 7, <DATA> + line 1. Argument "" isn't numeric in array element at index.pl line 7, <DATA> +line 1. Argument "" isn't numeric in array element at index.pl line 7, <DATA> +line 1. The hmneede` [download] The other code fragment prints `46:87:38:102:75:113:13:10`	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re: Re: Red Perl part I by ambrus (Abbot) on May 02, 2004 at 16:06 UTC
That's exactly what it prints for me when I don't remove the control-m's. When removing them, the output seems ok. I'm on i686-linux, perl 5.8.1.	[reply]


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks