I'm also curious for the reasons of his questions, so I asked him this question in his last thread. Anyone who is 'on trial' should at least get the opportunity to defend himself, don't they?
If his reasons are valid, I owe him an apology, but up
until now freak has used his right to remain silent. To me that is not a good sign.
If any new dubious questions are asked by him I urge everybody to first ask him why he wants to know, so other Perlmonks that don't know of these suspicions are made aware of them. We might all be involved in some kind of criminal/unethical activity if we don't.
