Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re: public key encryption

by derby (Abbot)
on May 29, 2004 at 02:14 UTC ( #357405=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

This node has not been edited yet.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://357405]
help
Chatterbox?
[Corion]: I don't think that Mojo or whatever would bring much, as the site is heavy on nested templates, but there are some things that could/should be eliminated ;)
[Corion]: Hi ambrus!
[marto]: I'd be interested in seeing the schema and some test data. I think the move could be done in stages.
[ambrus]: Corion: did you as the gods release any official opinion about how perlmonks is now on HTTPS?
[Corion]: Discipulus: I think once we have a test environment again and move to git, contribution and change gets easier
[Corion]: ambrus: I think there was some discussion and maybe even an entry in Tidings, but I'm not really sure
[marto]: Back later, got to get the kids ready
[ambrus]: Also, I still have the suspicion that Perlmonks as a website is still horribly insecure, and that a malicious attacker could take over anyone's account easily, and I should tell the details of why I think this in some Cabal-only place.
[Corion]: But the site now is on https (only), and now also with one unified SSL certificate for all PM hoss
[ambrus]: This worries me a lot especially because as a cbstream maintainer, if this happens, I could get falsely blamed for any insecurity.

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (7)
As of 2018-07-19 07:58 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer?















    Results (404 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?