Re: Short or Long Hand

Why not just use a simple regex:

print $day, $/ if $day !~ /^0|6$/;

Add:
I made a common beginner mistake and I feel really ashamed about it.

Although above code will work on a single digit as it was demanded
( $day representing a weekday field from localtime() )
it is not logic as it says: don't match 0 at the beginning or don't match 6 at the end.

With nonmatching parens ( !~ /^(?:0|6)$/ ) it will satisfy the logic, still matching nondigits though. So it would've even been better written as !~ /0|6/ since the expected data is a single digit.

I'm so sorry!

Comment on Re: Short or Long Hand Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Short or Long Hand by davorg (Chancellor) on Aug 12, 2004 at 15:33 UTC
Maybe because regexes are harder to get right. If you're not 100% sure that `$day` will always be between 0 and 6 (and I'm not sure you ever can be!) then you'd be better off with: `print $day, $/ if $day !~ /^(0\|6)$/;` [download] Precendence can be a problem :) -- <http://www.dave.org.uk> "The first rule of Perl club is you do not talk about Perl club." -- Chip Salzenberg	[reply] [d/l]
Re^2: Short or Long Hand by Eimi Metamorphoumai (Deacon) on Aug 12, 2004 at 15:30 UTC
That won't quite work--you need parens. `print $day, $/ if $day !~ /^(?:0\|6)$/;` [download] or `print $day, $/ if $day !~ /^[06]$/;` [download]	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: Short or Long Hand by Dietz (Curate) on Aug 12, 2004 at 15:37 UTC
It will work without parens as long as $day is a weekday field ranging 0..6 Char class ( `[06]` ) is another good idea since it is faster then the alteration but you wouldn't determine the speed diff on a single digit.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^2: Short or Long Hand by Scarborough (Hermit) on Aug 12, 2004 at 15:28 UTC
I like that one too, Im not that great at regex but it looks like I should do a little homework Thanks for your help	[reply]


more useful options
	PerlMonks