Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re: The Scriptorium impact on the Titlebar and the Front page (patients)

by tye (Sage)
on Sep 13, 2004 at 06:30 UTC ( [id://390503]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to The Scriptorium impact on the Titlebar and the Front page

Patience. We've barely created the section. It may eventually make it into the title bar and/or "Sections" nodelet, but I think "Left Overs" is more likely. But there will never be any effect of this section upon the front page (it isn't appropriate there), and we don't need to rush; with more experience in how discussions here work, we can better decide policy.

Although I think that allowing the public to comment within dicussions here is a good idea, don't make a big deal about "stated ... specific policy" since allowing public comment was also a matter of expediency since doing otherwise requires more site changes.

I'd also like to ammend my title suggestion to "Inner Scriptorium", to better reflect that much of what is discussed here should be of little concern to most of our users even though anyone who has the interest can take the time to read.

- tye        

  • Comment on Re: The Scriptorium impact on the Titlebar and the Front page (patients)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: The Scriptorium impact on the Titlebar and the Front page (patients)
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Sep 13, 2004 at 07:30 UTC

    I like "Site Scriptorium" more than "Inner Scriptorium" personally. It goes with the "Site Manuscript" designation used elsewhere a bit better I think.

    Having said that, perhaps the other designation should just be "Internal Manuscript"


    ---
    demerphq

      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
      -- Gandhi

      Flux8


      "Inner" seems more appropriate than "Site". But Scriptorium sounds like a bad Metallica song.

        Were there any good Metallica songs? ;-)


        ---
        demerphq

          First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
          -- Gandhi

          Flux8


      I like “Inner Scriptorium” better.

      “Site Scriptorium” suggests that the section is somehow related to the use of the site, which is not the case.

      Makeshifts last the longest.

Re^2: The Scriptorium impact on the Titlebar and the Front page (patients)
by dfaure (Chaplain) on Sep 13, 2004 at 19:38 UTC
    I think "Left Overs" is more likely

    a Good choice I haven't thought about, thanks.

    allowing public comment was also a matter of expediency since doing otherwise requires more site changes.

    "Since we're getting overhauled by these, lets makes as if we instigate them..." [Poor translation from french] ;)

    ____
    HTH, Dominique
    My two favorites:
    If the only tool you have is a hammer, you will see every problem as a nail. --Abraham Maslow
    Bien faire, et le faire savoir...

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://390503]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others having a coffee break in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-05-26 20:58 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found