Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling

Re^2: Make it good

by apotheon (Deacon)
on Oct 18, 2004 at 16:32 UTC ( #400210=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Make it good
in thread Make it good

Why is this joking? I can only assume you're referring to Windows, which really doesn't meet those criteria.

- apotheon
CopyWrite Chad Perrin

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Make it good
by CloneArmyCommander (Friar) on Oct 18, 2004 at 17:06 UTC
    I depend on Windows at school, my luck is if I submit something saying it absolutely does not meet any of the criteria, Windows would throw the blue screen of death at me :), hahaha :).
      Heh. Good point.
      Windows can be vindictive like that.

      - apotheon
      CopyWrite Chad Perrin
Re^3: Make it good
by BrowserUk (Pope) on Oct 18, 2004 at 17:41 UTC

    Neither does Unix or Linux.

    Examine what is said, not who speaks.
    "Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
    "Think for yourself!" - Abigail
    "Memory, processor, disk in that order on the hardware side. Algorithm, algorithm, algorithm on the code side." - tachyon
      In my experience, Linux (for example) is at least a lot closer to meeting every one of those goals than Windows. Obviously, these criteria are somewhat subjective in real-world application, but if you use either Linux or Windows as a basis for comparison, the other falls short of (in the case of Windows compared to Linux) or admirably meets (in the case of Linux compared to Windows) those goals.

      Granted, I don't know enough about the code in the Linux kernel to be able to comment particularly on its reusability and readability, but the fact that it's open source makes it reusable and readable, even if only with difficulty, while the closed source status of the Windows kernel makes it unreusable and unreadable — to say nothing of the fact that it's such a bloated, crufty collection of layered kludges that I have a hard time imagining pieces of its code being terribly reusable or readable, anyway.

      - apotheon
      CopyWrite Chad Perrin
        Don't redefine the terms. The OP was talking about reusable code in terms of software engineering - not about about licensing issues. perl is open source, but it's not very readable or reusable. And I've seen a lot of code that's both readable and reusable according to the definitions the OP gave, but which isn't open source.
        A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://400210]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (5)
As of 2020-10-19 21:35 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My favourite web site is:

    Results (207 votes). Check out past polls.