|
|
|
| Problems? Is your data what you think it is? | |
| PerlMonks |
Re^2: To use or not to use OO Perlby gothic_mallard (Pilgrim) |
| on Oct 22, 2004 at 14:59 UTC ( [id://401504]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
Surely that explanation applies to modules in general - not just of the OO flavour? Modules are by nature designed to facilitate code reuse and naturally they (should) come with their own documentation. How OO lends to a "fairly rigid testing structure" I'm not sure as, again, this seems to come under the heading of modules in general. All code is untested unless otherwise stated.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||