Re: A Proposal for Additional Levels

[Joost]

I think it's an interesting suggestion, and I like the titles. Two questions:

• Are there actually people who would cast a 100 votes a day? - I think I've only cast all my daily votes once since becoming a saint.
• Why you think its a good idea to have a fixed number of "lop-level" monks? I'm not convinced.

[thor]

Why you think its a good idea to have a fixed number of "lop-level" (sic) monks? I'm not convinced.

Can't have more than one pope at a time...;)

[Happy-the-monk]

Can't have more than one pope at a time...;)

Actually, over a longish period there have been 2 (or even 3?) popes around (in Avignon, southern France and in different places in Italy -- why should a pope have to live in Rome anyway?). Having only one pope is just so peaceful economic modern times...

A question there: Why is some pope higher than a saint? Because the pope appoints them? Well, then maybe whoever is a pope should do so.

Consider that real saints have a strong, certain, definite tendency towards having been dead for a longish period of time. If you take that into account, maybe saints should be allowed to become Angels, Cherubs, Archangels, Seraphs, you name them.

I also feel the XP curve should be a bit steeper.

Cheers, Sören

[Joost]

Ah. I Didn't read that table well - I thought the suggestion was to have a 100 of them.

Anyway, in that case: why have a pope at all?

nobody's every going to beat vroom's XP anyway. :-)

[BUU]

But we can try!

[Popcorn Dave]

Ummmmmm....

Assuming that Vroom would be pope and assuming that there is only one pope ( not highlander ) does that mean he'd have to become senile or be pushing up dasies before someone else wouuld become pope? ;)

[tbone1]

Can't have more than one pope at a time...;)

That would require a papal cage deathmatch ... which would really rawk!!!