http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=405623


in reply to Should we change linking so that conditional comments for IE are not destroyed?

Best use of this.
<!--[if IE 5]> <p> If you can read this, proceed to http://www.mozilla.org/products/f +irefox/ and dl Firefox</p> <![endif]-->
;) ZF

By the way, I posted this from work and the text did not show up until I put it in code tags. IE6 ;( work imposed
  • Comment on Re: Should we change linking so that conditional comments for IE are not destroyed?
  • Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Should we change linking so that conditional comments for IE are not destroyed?
by elusion (Curate) on Nov 05, 2004 at 21:20 UTC
    And while we're at it,
    <p style="display: none"> <font color="red" size="+4">You should be using a browser that support +s CSS!</font><br> <a href="http://mozilla.org">Upgrade now.</a> </p>
    ;-)

      Mozilla isn't an *upgrade* if you're using a different browser. I absolutely HATE the term "upgrade" where used instead of "migrate". For the record, Mozilla does NOT have a non-graphical browser. Besides that, not supporting CSS is a right that browsers have and you are not to tell me what to use. A good website maker makes a site usable for any browser. And CSS makes that easy if used right, so stop complaining.

      Note that I have seen your ";-)", but needed to say this because it's the third time I see someone suggesting something like this today.

      Juerd # { site => 'juerd.nl', plp_site => 'plp.juerd.nl', do_not_use => 'spamtrap' }

Re^2: Should we change linking so that conditional comments for IE are not destroyed?
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Nov 05, 2004 at 20:32 UTC

    It didnt work because the sites internal mechanism b0rked it. (Have a look at the source code). Hence the reason for this thread....

    ---
    demerphq