Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Object inheritance without AUTOLOAD

by tilly (Archbishop)
on Dec 05, 2004 at 07:03 UTC ( #412466=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Object inheritance without AUTOLOAD
in thread Object inheritance and AUTOLOAD

I see that you don't read my posts. :-P

For an idea of what Larry Wall planned on using AUTOLOAD for, see Shell.

But that said, I agree that AUTOLOAD is a sledgehammer not to be used lightly. However I'd disagree with you on whether you need to use a custom can if you use AUTOLOAD. See Why breaking can() is acceptable for a fuller explanation of my views.

  • Comment on Re^2: Object inheritance without AUTOLOAD

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Object inheritance without AUTOLOAD
by diotalevi (Canon) on Dec 05, 2004 at 07:50 UTC

    Oh ok fine. I use Shell myself but rarely if ever think of it. So you got me. There are other uses for AUTOLOAD than I mentioned and the ones you mentioned are actually useful. I was thinking of the common use of AUTOLOAD to delay method generation. Its that practice that I see is completely out of whack and that I'm thinking of when I complain about people who use AUTOLOAD.

    It also occurs to me that using AUTOLOAD in the way I actually complained about exerts addition runtime penalties that would not normally exist - the entire method cache is invalided whenever the newly generated function is assigned into place.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://412466]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (2)
As of 2020-10-22 07:18 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My favourite web site is:












    Results (225 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?