Re: alternate approaches to mixing behavior using Language::Functional and Class::Prototyped

It is well thought out, well-designed and covers the functionality offered by earlier MVC frameworks with powerful, featureful controllers such as CGI::Application and Zanas.

I respectfully refer you to Review: CGI::Prototype with regards to this claim. Now, nearly anything merlyn (or any other expert programmer) will be powerful and well-designed. But, I would hesitate to say it "covers the functionality" of C::A, Zanas, or any other MVC architecture without a side-by-side comparison of said features.

Not to mention that CGI::Prototype isn't based on Class::Prototyped so much as it uses it. The name, according to merlyn, is more that it is meant to be the prototypical CGI application vs. being a prototyped application. (Which makes me think that he should have called it MVC::Controller::Prototype ... given that he wasn't attempting to replace CGI::Application.)

Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing.
Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid.
Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence.
Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.

Comment on Re: alternate approaches to mixing behavior using Language::Functional and Class::Prototyped


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks