P is for Practical | |
PerlMonks |
Re^5: Use method/function signatures with Perlby Juerd (Abbot) |
on Dec 07, 2004 at 18:53 UTC ( [id://412971]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Funny. I thought that I just said that Attribute::Property is an unacceptable solution to me. That means that it doesn't take away the issue. I'm not disagreeing about that. You said that I indicated something; I cannot recall having indicated that exact thing, and tried to correct. Let's not make a big deal out of everything. Feel offended if you wish, but please only do so knowing that I didn't mean "flawed" as an absolute condemnation and that no offense was intended. I like Perl for its tolerance towards almost all programming styles, but that doesn't mean I steer clear of discussion. With OO I'd expect to be able to do something like create a Length module, Length objects can be accessed/set in various units (inches, meters, feet, miles, etc). An external user should have no idea what the internal representation is. How do I do it with lvalues? In that rather specific case I would not use lvalues, or any setter method, for that matter. I'd be inclined to think of these values as immutable objects, and have something like: But instead of using Length objects, I am much more likely to dictate that every length must be stored in meters, as a number. Possibly with the addition of utility functions to aid in conversion. And whichever I do, I'll feel free to dislike people who categorically declare that my considered set of choices are flawed. I'm sorry you make this about people. I wonder, though, how you survive PM if you take offense every time someone disagrees with you on a technical subject. You are of course free to dislike me, or any person. Even though we will probably never meet in person, I regret that you dislike *me* instead of only what I said. Juerd # { site => 'juerd.nl', plp_site => 'plp.juerd.nl', do_not_use => 'spamtrap' }
In Section
Meditations
|
|