Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Considering nodes for re-titling

by Errto (Vicar)
on Jan 06, 2005 at 00:41 UTC ( #419780=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Considering nodes for re-titling

As a relatively recent arrival to Level 6: Friar I've noticed one particularly unhealthy pattern: requests to retitle SoPW nodes because the OP had some problem code but misunderstood where the problem is. In other words, the suggested title reflects the answers to the question, rather than the question itself as the OP understood it.

To me, the importance of this goes beyond respecting authorship. The reason for preserving such titles is that a future seeker with a similar problem is probably more likely to frame their query in the way the OP did than in what the responses reflected. Please take care not to change the meaning of titles in this way.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://419780]
help
Chatterbox?
[hippo]: That was around April 1994. Fun times.
[hippo]: They had purchased some shiny new 486 DXs the year before but crippled them by installing Win 3.1. I demo'd Linux with X on them to the department head and got the go-ahead to wipe Windows and install the new hotness.
[marto]: glory days ;)

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (12)
As of 2018-06-22 09:54 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?



    Results (124 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?