in reply to Re^2: RFC: Implicit Parallelization Pragma
in thread RFC: Implicit Parallelization Pragma
hardburn,
Might I suggest you use a different example then. I didn't think you were proposing FIFO, but the example seemed that way to me. Additionally, I think having a second more constrained version that did guarantee order would still be useful. Imagine the following project:
Might I suggest you use a different example then. I didn't think you were proposing FIFO, but the example seemed that way to me. Additionally, I think having a second more constrained version that did guarantee order would still be useful. Imagine the following project:
- Get the length of all words in the list
- Look each word up in a dictionary
- Count the number of syllables in a word
In other words, the elapsed time becomes close to the length for the longest pole in the tent. Some time is also spent ordering the results as they become available. Of course, I may be way out in left field here.
Cheers - L~R
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^4: RFC: Implicit Parallelization Pragma
by hardburn (Abbot) on Jan 26, 2005 at 14:22 UTC |
In Section
Meditations