Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation

Re: Solaris, Perl 5.8 and use 5.005

by Anonymous Monk
on Mar 07, 2005 at 14:32 UTC ( #437219=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Solaris, Perl 5.8 and use 5.005

My god man upgrade the OS! Is there some application you guys have in house that needs to run or 2.6 or something? You are missing out on tons of benefits by not at least being at Solaris 8.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Solaris, Perl 5.8 and use 5.005
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Mar 07, 2005 at 14:59 UTC
    They're also missing out on the transition costs, which can be extremely substantial.

    There are programs written in the late 70's that are running on hardware built in the early 70's that have been touched only to make them Y2K compliant (and some not even then). These programs do everything from keep the lights on to issue Treasury bonds to determine whether a nuclear-tipped missile should launch or not. I don't know about you, but I'd rather not "upgrade" a nuclear-weapons computer when it's been working just fine for 30+ years. But, maybe I'm just paranoid. Maybe, you can keep track of every change made between version 3.4 and version 27.8 and calculate how each will affect every one of the million lines of code written in a language that was deprecated when I was still in diapers.

    And, maybe we just didn't need Detroit.

    Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing.
    Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid.
    Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence.
    Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.

      Every time i hear this argument im reminded of something. For a while we had a system that nobody wanted to touch. It was a scary hack done by someone in the far reaches of time. Well one day somebody was bold enough to decide to write a replacement system. They put it into play and did a paralel run. Much consternation was caused by the fact the outputs were different. The developer of the new system however was pretty surprised by this and as such began to do a detailed analysis of the code involved. Turned out the output of the two systems was different because the original system never worked properly in the first place. Well, needless to say the old system was soon replaced by the new system, and lo and behold, much money was earned and much rejoicing was done.

      Not that it means your point is wrong, but there is another side to it. ;-)


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://437219]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (4)
As of 2020-10-26 04:09 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My favourite web site is:

    Results (250 votes). Check out past polls.