Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Calling a sub from a variable ?

by johndageek (Hermit)
on Mar 22, 2005 at 13:26 UTC ( [id://441441]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Calling a sub from a variable ?
in thread Calling a sub from a variable ?

Why so surly Zur?
You did ask for advice in a way that had people responding.
You got responses
You didn't care for a response/someone didn't respond the way you wanted them to so, now you jump on them?
Your last line should have been your first in this response
I know, I know, you don't need me to boss you around etc., I here by acknowledge myself appropriately chastised.

Enjoy!
Dageek

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Calling a sub from a variable ?
by ZlR (Chaplain) on Mar 22, 2005 at 13:44 UTC
    I know , I tend to be a little bit on the agressive side sometimes, but i was the one feeling jumped upon.
    Maybe one should be carefull before giving such advice ...
    "Walk a mile in my shoes ..."
    And you do note that the IO comment is interesting but wrong .
    i know it's no reason to get nervous, i'm just over-reactive sometimes ... well

    Keep the spirit,
    zen le renard

      And you do note that the IO comment is interesting but wrong .

      Actually, the I/O comment by AnonyMonk is correct in most situations. Now, it may not be correct in your specific setup, but I would have done some Benchmarks before making an offhand comment like that. Or, maybe I would have used Devel::DProf to determine what was taking up a lot of time in my application - I/O or eval.

      Being right, does not endow the right to be rude; politeness costs nothing.
      Being unknowing, is not the same as being stupid.
      Expressing a contrary opinion, whether to the individual or the group, is more often a sign of deeper thought than of cantankerous belligerence.
      Do not mistake your goals as the only goals; your opinion as the only opinion; your confidence as correctness. Saying you know better is not the same as explaining you know better.

        I don't know, dragonchild .
        Unix logics make me think that the evaled code would be in memory as soon as the second call to eval on the same function . I'd say the IO argument stands only if you eval things only once .

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://441441]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others admiring the Monastery: (7)
As of 2024-09-17 08:00 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    The PerlMonks site front end has:





    Results (22 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?
    erzuuli‥ 🛈The London Perl and Raku Workshop takes place on 26th Oct 2024. If your company depends on Perl, please consider sponsoring and/or attending.