Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

Better with warnings

by deibyz (Hermit)
on Apr 12, 2005 at 15:35 UTC ( #447049=obfuscated: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

Just a little idea i had while playing with the regex engine.

#!/usr/bin/perl use strict;use warnings; $SIG{__WARN__}=sub{($_)=@_;/^\w+\s\w+(\w)(?{print$1})(?<=[A-Z])/};open + Ozybied,$0;print Ozybied"Just Another Perl Hack";

Must be saved to a file in order to work properly.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Better with warnings
by cristian (Hermit) on Apr 12, 2005 at 16:31 UTC
    The result is :deibyz you must do her duty of JAPH. .- Just Another Perl Hacker, Is wrong or It is ok???
      cristian,
      It is not mandatory for the code posted in this section to be a JAPH. It often is, but some of the most interesting things here were completely different.

      Check out:
      Erudil's camel code and eyepopslikeamosquito's Saturn if you haven't already.

      All that's required is that the methodology of the script is not imeddiatly apparent to all. In short - simply obfuscated code.

        Yes understand. I not criticize the code , only questions the finaly the obfuscade code not search to outwit with Japh. For what outwit japh and where is the concept? My end not is to offend , is learn. Thanks ktros and deibyz for learn.
      Was intended as a signature. The "Just Another Perl Hack" is just to distract attention.
        Yes i undestend , but , ofuscated sections it based in japh? or signature? or simply ofuscated code.? The signature is good , where is the concept.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: obfuscated [id://447049]
Approved by ktross
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (2)
As of 2022-05-20 12:01 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you prefer to work remotely?



    Results (73 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?