Re^2: in_array and skipping foreach

This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors. Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.

There's no specific function for finding a value in an array.

Eh? What about grep? Seems like it would do just what the OP wanted.

Comment on Re^2: in_array and skipping foreach

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: in_array and skipping foreach by RazorbladeBidet (Friar) on Apr 13, 2005 at 10:36 UTC
Ah yes, I spoke to soon. Shouldn't write answers when distracted ;) -------------- "But what of all those sweet words you spoke in private?" "Oh that's just what we call pillow talk, baby, that's all."	[reply]
Re^3: in_array and skipping foreach by jbrugger (Parson) on Apr 13, 2005 at 10:43 UTC
Isn't it faster to create a lookuptable next to your array? The value in the array will be the key in the lookup table (hash) with the value 0 or 1. "We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on when it's necessary to compromise." - Larry Wall.	[reply]
Re^4: in_array and skipping foreach by VSarkiss (Monsignor) on Apr 13, 2005 at 10:59 UTC
Faster? Maybe. Doable? Definitely. I wasn't saying anything about better or worse, just pointing out the thinko in the parent node. Do not rebuke them with harsh words ... but rather lead them gently - with URLs - so that they may learn wisdom.	[reply]

• hippo

• erzuuli

‥ Anonymous Monks are no longer allowed to use Super Search, due to an excessive use of this resource by robots.


Your skill will accomplish what the force of many cannot
	PerlMonks