Come for the quick hacks, stay for the epiphanies. | |
PerlMonks |
Re^4: cut vs split (suggestions)by sk (Curate) |
on Apr 17, 2005 at 07:01 UTC ( [id://448601]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Very interesting! Thanks for the new idea! I lost my server connection for some reason and so I tested this on my laptop and I do see a very good improvement with the your modification. update: corrected <> with $_ per pijll post this finishes in about 14 seconds.... corrected timing
this takes about 18 seconds I don't have a timing utility in Windows so the times are just wallclock times. I guess windows is faster because the process run at 100% CPU (or whatever is required i guess?). On the UNIX servers the process might be more time-shared? My laptop is 1.6G Centrino/1GB Ram/perl, v5.6.1 cheers SK Update: Thanks pijll, the time it takes to run your version of the code is almost same as the one that uses -n.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|