Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation
 
PerlMonks  

Re^7: Analyzing large Perl code base.

by dragonchild (Archbishop)
on Apr 18, 2005 at 12:43 UTC ( #448819=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^6: Analyzing large Perl code base.
in thread Analyzing large Perl code base.

. . . in a organization of any significant size, it's generally a bad idea for developers to make unilateral decisions about how the product should be changed.

Yes, you are absolutely correct. Now, if only Marketing or the business units would get their heads out of the collective asses long enough to actually provide usable direction to us developers, we could all go home and have milk and cookies before naptime.

I have worked at 9 different places in the past 7 years. At 5 of them, developers wrote specifications. At 2 of them, developers co-wrote specifications. So, in less than a quarter of the places I have worked at, developers received usable specs.

I've been lucky.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://448819]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2018-07-19 02:33 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer?















    Results (399 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?