Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: pissed off about functional programming

by dragonchild (Archbishop)
on Apr 25, 2005 at 12:41 UTC ( #451162=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: pissed off about functional programming
in thread pissed off about functional programming

Only if those languages have the facilities Perl provides. I once tried writing some C with a Perl accent and it was ... ugly. The first thing I tried to do was abstract away my memory management. (Reading the Perl source helped here, but doubly-indirected variables scare me on so many levels.) The second thing was to redesign, given I didn't have hashes. (I was using ANSI C.) At that point, I kinda gave up, rewrote the damn thing in Perl in about 20min, verified that it still ran in under 2 milliseconds, and walked away.
  • Comment on Re^4: pissed off about functional programming

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: pissed off about functional programming
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Apr 26, 2005 at 16:06 UTC

    Im pretty sure I write C with a Perl accent. The most obvious example of this is that I almost never use statements where blocks are allowed.

    ---
    demerphq

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://451162]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (7)
As of 2019-10-15 20:26 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Notices?