Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic

Re^5: pissed off about functional programming

by Anonymous Monk
on Apr 25, 2005 at 23:59 UTC ( #451389=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^4: pissed off about functional programming
in thread pissed off about functional programming

So.. you spend five weeks writing a web browser in a strictly O'Caml functional style, then I'll see if I can write an O'Caml imperative version that matches your feature set in one year. Or how about you do your version in O'Caml, and I'll do my version in Java? Again, you get five weeks, and I get a year.
Do it guys, I'd love to see something better in the (free) browser department than Mozilla. (There's a project that could use some desperate refactoring (functional or otherwise))
  • Comment on Re^5: pissed off about functional programming

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
OT (was: pissed off about functional programming)
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Apr 30, 2005 at 04:25 UTC

    You think it’s possible for one guy to rewrite something to the level of completeness that Gecko has reached, within in a year? I’m no fan of the bloat that Gecko has become, but I’m absolutely certain you’re setting yourself up for some disappointment.

    Makeshifts last the longest.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://451389]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (3)
As of 2020-09-27 13:33 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    If at first I donít succeed, I Ö

    Results (142 votes). Check out past polls.