Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Frank
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Loose vs. Tight Coupling

by dragonchild (Archbishop)
on May 02, 2005 at 10:00 UTC ( [id://453237]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors. Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.


in reply to Loose vs. Tight Coupling

Loose coupling is a tradeoff between higher design costs and lower maintenance costs. If you know you will be spending a lot of time in maintenance, then the higher design cost is amortized over the savings in maintenance. If, however, you won't be doing that much maintenance, then loose coupling is a waste of time.

In other words, if you can guarantee that maintenance will not be an issue, then couple tightly. But, personally, I've never been able to guarantee that. *shrugs*


The Perfect is the Enemy of the Good.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://453237]
help
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Notices?
    hippoepoptai's answer Re: how do I set a cookie and redirect was blessed by hippo!
    erzuuliAnonymous Monks are no longer allowed to use Super Search, due to an excessive use of this resource by robots.