Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic

Re^2: IF Statement Testing

by rg0now (Chaplain)
on May 14, 2005 at 09:27 UTC ( #457007=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: IF Statement Testing
in thread IF Statement Testing

But what I find more interesting is that the OP totally intuitively discovered junctions, and almost perfectly found the right syntax as well. Look at this variant:
if ($expire !~ any(1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14)){...}

Update: thanks gaal for lighting me up, although, I can not entirely grasp, what is the problem above...:-). Intuitively, $x ~~ none(...) should give the same result as $x !~ any(...), or at least, my intuition suggests this...

Anyway, here is an updated syntax that even more resembles to the OP's idea, and it actually works right in Pugs:

if (!($expire ~~ 1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14)) {...}
Interestingly, Pugs requires parens around the if condition. Is this a bug?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: IF Statement Testing
by gaal (Parson) on May 14, 2005 at 09:32 UTC
    That unfortunately doesn't work, because there always exists an element in the junction so that $expire !~ it. The condition is always true.
      Unfortunately, English usage of negatives doesn't map well to current Perl 6 syntax. I have started a discussion on perl6-language about whether we should do "not raising" or disallow use of negative ops on junctions entirely.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://457007]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (4)
As of 2018-06-18 06:48 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (109 votes). Check out past polls.