Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number

Re^3: RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags

by jdporter (Paladin)
on Jun 22, 2005 at 17:08 UTC ( [id://469096]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags
in thread RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags

It's not so much that there's a difference, but rather, that people should use different terms for different things, and should continue to use a single well established term for a single thing.

I think you should consider using the term "keywords" unless it will seriously hinder comprehension and adoption by your target audience.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags
by DrHyde (Prior) on Jun 23, 2005 at 09:05 UTC
    If using the word "keywords" will confuse the target audience, then the target audience is far too stupid for you to want to target them with anything less than the Black Death.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://469096]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-07-17 13:57 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    erzuuli‥ 🛈The London Perl and Raku Workshop takes place on 26th Oct 2024. If your company depends on Perl, please consider sponsoring and/or attending.