Corion, please reread the original post. I said, It will necessarily not affect anonymonks' postings. which means that I already recognise that anonymous monks can't mark this. That whole paragraph pointed out the limitations. Then, later, I pointed out that if we were willing to accept that there are limitations, and that it's not perfect, it may still be acceptable.
Do I take this response to mean that you're against this type of convention just because not everyone can or will use it?
| [reply] |
I don't see much point in the convention, but I didn't see much point in prefixing node titles with ones nickname either, even back when Newest Nodes did not display the name of the posting monk. I think my main point is, that since Anonymous Monk initiates a lot of threads, there won't be much effect of the convention. But then again, I read most of Perlmonks and I'm not necessarily on the hunt for "unsolved problems".
| [reply] |
