|
|
| Problems? Is your data what you think it is? | |
| PerlMonks |
Re: Ranks Higher Than Saintby tlm (Prior) |
| on Jul 13, 2005 at 20:16 UTC ( [id://474711]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors. Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.
XP is useful to a point, but it is imperfect in pretty fundamental ways (i.e. it would be very difficult, if not impossible, to fix it). That's why I am against any change that would lure monks into paying any more attention to it than we already do. If anything, I would vote for fewer levels:
Upon hitting XP == 2000, I'd freeze the XP and forget about it; plus I'd add a second statistic: Average Post Rep. The two stats serve entirely different purposes. XP measures one's ability to function as a trustworthy monk, while the avg. post rep measures the Monastery's opinion of one's contributions. This is still very imperfect, but I think it's a small improvement. But, realistically, I expect the system to remain unchanged. It works pretty well, IMO. the lowliest monk
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||