Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks vroom
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Ranks Higher Than Saint

by tlm (Prior)
on Jul 13, 2005 at 20:16 UTC ( [id://474711]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors. Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.


in reply to Ranks Higher Than Saint

XP is useful to a point, but it is imperfect in pretty fundamental ways (i.e. it would be very difficult, if not impossible, to fix it). That's why I am against any change that would lure monks into paying any more attention to it than we already do. If anything, I would vote for fewer levels:

  • Suspect (XP < 200)
  • Candidate (200 <= XP < 700)
  • Novice (700 <= XP < 2000)
  • Monasterian (2000 == XP)

Upon hitting XP == 2000, I'd freeze the XP and forget about it; plus I'd add a second statistic: Average Post Rep. The two stats serve entirely different purposes. XP measures one's ability to function as a trustworthy monk, while the avg. post rep measures the Monastery's opinion of one's contributions.

This is still very imperfect, but I think it's a small improvement.

But, realistically, I expect the system to remain unchanged. It works pretty well, IMO.

the lowliest monk

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Ranks Higher Than Saint
by monarch (Priest) on Jul 13, 2005 at 22:34 UTC
    I think this is a great solution! tlm++!

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://474711]
help
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Notices?
    hippoepoptai's answer Re: how do I set a cookie and redirect was blessed by hippo!
    erzuuliAnonymous Monks are no longer allowed to use Super Search, due to an excessive use of this resource by robots.