Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery

Re: In support of downvoting plagiarism

by Joost (Canon)
on Aug 29, 2005 at 12:43 UTC ( [id://487394]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to In support of downvoting plagiarism

I disagree. Answering questions is not a race :-)

I think genuine SoPW answers should only be downvoted if they contain harmful advice - and then I usually prefer to reply with an explanation why it's bad advice.

There is nothing wrong with a good answer that has already been given. The wording of a reply can help clarify an already given anwer, and having multiple "identical" answers can indicate a consensus on how to solve the particular problem. I think it's a waste to downvote perfectly good answers - even if they add nothing to a thread. If anything, it's discouraging to the poster.

  • Comment on Re: In support of downvoting plagiarism

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://487394]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others sharing their wisdom with the Monastery: (5)
As of 2024-05-18 06:42 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found