|
|
|
good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
| PerlMonks |
Re^3: Keeping sharp and freshby dragonchild (Archbishop) |
| on Sep 23, 2005 at 09:01 UTC ( [id://494512]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors. Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.
Test-Driven Development. It's a practice that was made popular by XP (eXtreme Programming). The theory goes something like this:
At all times, your entire test suite should always pass, except for the one test that you're currently failing because that's the one specific piece of the spec that you're currently implementing. Whatever is in source control should always pass all the tests. Theoretically, you have 100% code coverage (as reported by Devel::Cover) because you never wrote a piece of code without having written the test for it first. My criteria for good software:
In Section
Meditations
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||