Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic

Re^3: Teaching Children How to Program

by monarch (Priest)
on Nov 14, 2005 at 00:27 UTC ( #508178=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: Teaching Children How to Program
in thread Teaching Children How to Program

The library was my sole teacher. No humans required.

I started off with Basic (on a Dick Smith VZ200) when about 10/11 years old. I started to teach myself Pascal when 13 and I didn't get into C and assembler until I was around 14. I still have the Turbo C 2.0 manuals from then and use the library reference even today.

Teaching kids who want to learn is a worthwhile endeavour. But anyone who wants to know will learn of their own accord.

I guess pointing kids in the right direction is the main thing..

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Teaching Children How to Program
by Tanktalus (Canon) on Nov 14, 2005 at 03:47 UTC

    I started off with QBASIC on an Atari400 when I was 11, based on a single book. Had a lot of fun. That's great that it worked for you and I - we happened upon our passions. Many people, however, need to be shown things until they find their passion. For many (most?!) of the kids Sandy will be teaching, programming isn't going to be it. However, there may be one or two kids who just completely latch on to the experience, not having seen it before (or not having had the opportunity to try it before). And that's exactly the reason why we expose our kids to various things - to help them find their passion.

    Kids who find their passion on their own, that's great. But why leave such an important thing as "the rest of your life" to chance like that? By all means, don't force them into something (well, not for too long - sometimes doing what you don't like builds character, and that's important, too). Expose them to it.

    I suppose one of the biggest things I've learned in life so far is that everyone learns differently. Some kids seek out their passion. Others need to be exposed to something before they discover it. Some find a passion, then change their minds a few years later. None of these are bad - they just are.

    Intro classes are great - you'll find 50% of the kids don't continue in it (that's good - they've been exposed, and discovered it's not their passion, so they can continue looking), 30% will like it enough to try a second class before discontinuing, 20% may go on a bit further, but never develop a career out of it, a few may go on and make it into a career, and maybe one or two will find it to be their passion. All of these, that is what makes what Sandy volunteered to do worthwhile. Including the ones who don't pursue it. They may think it's dumb today, but 15-20 years from now, they'll look back and be glad that not only they took the course, but that they didn't pursue it. :-)

Re^4: Teaching Children How to Program
by mikeock (Hermit) on Nov 15, 2005 at 03:27 UTC

    I Completely agree. If someone wanted to learn than one will learn.

    I taught myself perl and started creating usefull programs within about 6 months. After having done this I qualified for a new scripting position involving VBScript.

    Wanting to script rather than my old job, has given me way more than enough motivation to learn a second language.

    Side note: Today I am told that I should also learn tcl. .... Away we go!

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://508178]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (7)
As of 2018-06-22 00:38 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (120 votes). Check out past polls.