Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Joe
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Re (tilly) 2: Is 'Newest Nodes' broken?

by tilly (Archbishop)
on Jan 10, 2001 at 12:25 UTC ( [id://50912]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors. Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.


in reply to Re: Is 'Newest Nodes' broken?
in thread Is 'Newest Nodes' broken?

Considering how often this comes up would it be a good idea to have a check and have a maximum number of days that you present with Newest Nodes?

In a similar vein I would find it very convenient if there was a way to have Newest Nodes accept a time range (or post range). During the day if I have a few minutes to read and I am a bit behind it is impossible to catch up on everything and mark all read. So it accumulates to the end of the day. But if I could take on an hour here, an hour there then catching up on PM in pieces would be more feasible.

(It would also help people who want to catch up on what happened over a break.)

  • Comment on Re (tilly) 2: Is 'Newest Nodes' broken?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re (tilly) 2: Is 'Newest Nodes' broken?
by Blue (Hermit) on Jan 10, 2001 at 17:49 UTC
    If you clear your last checked flag, it will instead give you a # of days. The default is 1, and every time you go back it gets reset to 1, but I've found it rather useful.

    =Blue
    ...you might be eaten by a grue...

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://50912]
help
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Notices?
    hippoepoptai's answer Re: how do I set a cookie and redirect was blessed by hippo!
    erzuuliAnonymous Monks are no longer allowed to use Super Search, due to an excessive use of this resource by robots.