Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Re: OT: Ruby On Rails - your thoughts?

by Ovid (Cardinal)
on Nov 17, 2005 at 04:52 UTC ( #509287=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to OT: Ruby On Rails - your thoughts?

Ruby on Rails is a fantastic technology and, from what I've seen, it really does make creating Web apps much faster. However, that being said, I've been hearing more and more that one of the strongest strengths of Rails is not the code, but the evangalism. Whether or not that is really true is not something I can say, but you'll find some pointed comments about the RoR developer's database knowledge in this thread.

Also, if you sign up for the Catalyst mailing list, you can peruse a recent thread I started about this topic. The people have many interesting things to say about each solution. The (rough) consensus seemed to be that Rails is easier to use, harder to customize. Catalyst is the reverse. Which matters more to you will depend upon your needs.

There were also assertions that Catalyst is faster and more scalable and the only objection I heard was "yes, but Ruby 2.0 is just around the corner!" Needless to say, waiting for an upgrade of the underlying language is not a good option. Catalyst also has much poorer documentation and that's usually a huge obstacle to overcome.

Cheers,
Ovid

New address of my CGI Course.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://509287]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2020-12-03 01:41 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How often do you use taint mode?





    Results (49 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?