Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Namespaces and module suggestions again, OBDII

by shotgunefx (Parson)
on Nov 23, 2005 at 05:01 UTC ( [id://510996]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Namespaces and module suggestions again, OBDII
in thread Namespaces and module suggestions again, OBDII

Apparently the ELM327 is only a few weeks old. Didn't really pick up on it before, but the 320 and 322 are for cars that utilize PWM and VPW respectively. I thought they were previous revisions of the interface.

Looking at the data sheets, seems to confirm that the command set and return values are the same for all (Excluding the 327, which uses CAN and has a lot of other options). So this should work in theory for all of the popular varients.

So maybe OBDII::ELM32X instead? Though it seems like Device should be in there somewhere from a taxonomy point of view.

Plus It needs a Device::SerialPort or Win32::SerialPort or subclass passed to it's constructor. What do you think of
"Device::OBDII::ELM32X"


-Lee

perl digital dash (in progress)
  • Comment on Re^2: Namespaces and module suggestions again, OBDII

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://510996]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-25 05:39 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found