Re: Year 2038

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Year 2038 by kwaping (Priest) on Dec 27, 2005 at 22:04 UTC
I'm sure that's what a lot of old programmers were saying about Y2K. :)	[reply]
Re^3: Year 2038 by ambrus (Abbot) on Dec 27, 2005 at 22:18 UTC
There's really no reason to worry about the second epoch, as an asteroid will wipe out the Earth's population in 2036.	[reply]
Re^4: Year 2038 by merlyn (Sage) on Dec 27, 2005 at 23:32 UTC
We'll still have people that want to have five-year planners in 2035. {grin} -- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.	[reply]
Re^4: Year 2038 by spiritway (Vicar) on Dec 28, 2005 at 06:16 UTC
There's really no reason to worry about the second epoch, as an asteroid will wipe out the Earth's population in 2036. You know, I really hate when stuff like that happens...	[reply]
Re^2: Year 2038 by Perl Mouse (Chaplain) on Jan 06, 2006 at 10:24 UTC
Yeah, but the OP's module might be used by your pension fund... `Perl --((8:>*`	[reply]


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks