Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change

Re^6: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider

by Aristotle (Chancellor)
on Jan 13, 2006 at 10:47 UTC ( #522944=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^5: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider
in thread Modify choices for Nodes to Consider

“Abstain” over “nada” would be excellent – it always bugged me that “nada” seems to imply a vote for doing nothing, rather than no vote at all.

“Modify” sounds like a clear improvement over “edit” and “fix,” as well; in fact, so much so that I now feel inclined to say it needs changing.

I don’t like “as is” much because it’s not a verb. My quibble with “keep” is linguistic hair-splitting: keeping a node implies an active preserving action, whereas the meaning of the vote is for the janitors to passively take none. “Leave alone” would express this exactly, but is a bit long. I follow the argument that shortening it to “leave” makes it too imprecise, though. Hey, for “leave alone,” the thesaurus lists “let be;” does that seem palatable?

The options would then be as follows:

☐ Let be   ☐ Modify   ☐ Reap   ☐ Abstain

I quite like the look of that – it’s only slightly longer than what we have now, and much more precise.

Makeshifts last the longest.

  • Comment on Re^6: Modify choices for Nodes to Consider

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://522944]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2018-11-15 23:18 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My code is most likely broken because:

    Results (192 votes). Check out past polls.

    • (Sep 10, 2018 at 22:53 UTC) Welcome new users!