Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Are Message Catalogs Worth It?

by pboin (Deacon)
on Feb 20, 2006 at 17:39 UTC ( #531470=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Are Message Catalogs Worth It?

Not knowing too much about your specs, I'd lean towards "Yes, have a structured message system."

For one, it's really not that difficult before-the-fact. It can be much more expensive to implement if you change your mind and do it later. Also, it should be much easier to standardize and control the message delivery, (formatting, tense, tone-of-speech, etc.).

Finally, I think it would be easier to test. One of my pet peeves is when a project has the capability to issue messages that aren't to be found in the docs. If the messages are structured, you'll be able to more easily ensure that they're all documented correctly.

I just can't really see much downside to doing it 'right'. Who ever regretted that?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://531470]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (2)
As of 2021-07-31 20:38 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?