Re: NASA cracker used perl
by rhesa (Vicar) on May 06, 2006 at 10:31 UTC
|
<Irony alert! Irony alert!>
This is precisely why I always promote .Net for safe computing. Their compiler actively prevents you from hacking into other peoples' networks by prohibiting random data streams over untrusted sockets.
Rumor has it that .Net 3.0 will proactively send cease-and-desist letters on your victim's behalf, while alerting the BSA, the FBI, and the RIAA.
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
Re: NASA cracker used perl
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on May 06, 2006 at 13:33 UTC
|
He also used Java!
Oh, and he used a computer!
Makeshifts last the longest.
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
Re: NASA cracker used perl
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on May 06, 2006 at 11:32 UTC
|
No, the graphical remote viewer works frame by frame. It's a Java application, so there's nothing to save on your hard drive,
Now that really sounds like alien technology.
A picture viewer written in Java that operates remotely over dial-up and leaves no evidence proof on your harddrive. Cool.
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
Re: NASA cracker used perl
by nimdokk (Vicar) on May 08, 2006 at 16:10 UTC
|
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
|
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
Re: NASA cracker used perl
by jacques (Priest) on May 07, 2006 at 05:10 UTC
|
Forget the alien technology. I am just glad they spelled Perl right! | [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
Re: NASA cracker used perl
by zentara (Archbishop) on May 06, 2006 at 16:52 UTC
|
The guy's photo sure makes him look sinister.... not the typical Perl hacker.
I'm not really a human, but I play one on earth.
flash japh
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
Re: NASA cracker used perl
by wazoox (Prior) on May 06, 2006 at 20:31 UTC
|
And his motivations ("UFO dissimulation") sound weird. This guy is probably a bit crazy... | [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
(OT) Re: NASA cracker used perl
by sir_lichtkind (Friar) on May 07, 2006 at 14:20 UTC
|
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
|
I went to that site and looked for a while without even being able to find a claim that they had evidence, let alone the actual evidence. Then only thing they do have is recorded statments but you have to pay to see them. Now if they had actual evidence of aliens in any form what-so-ever don't you think it would be in the biggest boldest letters on their front page? That website only managed to convince me that this is a scam of some sort to get peoples money. Charging for something when the whole idea is disclosure seems a bit odd doesn't it?
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
|
The project is run the government^W the men in black and the reason they charge is so they have proper documentation of who they need monitor. And if they think that you are really are on to something, they will pop by your house and put so much LSD in your orange juice no-one will ever believe a thing you say..... If you recover at all that is.....
---
$world=~s/war/peace/g
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
|
|
Yeah, that's why it's really sad : all these poor people really believe in this horse p**.
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
|