I assume you are aware, (and it probably should be mentioned), that the referenced method is (I assume), a joke along the same lines as the included method of finding tomorrow's date:
sub tomorrow_date {
sleep 86_400;
return localtime();
}
Without all the compile-time reductions, lazy evaluation etc. that most properly functional languages benefit from, this method of determining the eveness of a number is ludicrously inefficient--6000+ times slower than the normal method:
#! perl -slw
use strict;
use Benchmark qw[ cmpthese ];
no warnings 'recursion';
sub odd { my $number = shift; return !even ($number); }
sub even { my $number = abs shift; return 1 if $number == 0; return od
+d ($number - 1); }
cmpthese -5, {
normal => q[ my $n; $_ & 1 and $n++ for 1 .. 1000; ],
functional => q[ my $n; even( $_ ) and $n++ for 1 .. 1000; ],
};
__END__
c:\test>junk
s/iter functional normal
functional 1.50 -- -100%
normal 2.41e-004 625042% --
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
|