Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Config Files in Perl

by traveler (Parson)
on Nov 22, 2006 at 23:06 UTC ( #585640=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Config Files in Perl
in thread Config Files in Perl

They might. OTOH it might all be done by software. That wasn't specified.

Now, I agree that XML is not beautiful, but so many people who might edit config files probably are at least somwehat used to HTML, and even vim knows XML highlighting. I do not think it is a problem unless the config file designer goes wild...

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Config Files in Perl
by Firefly258 (Beadle) on Nov 23, 2006 at 07:29 UTC
    You should be programming away from bad/worst case scenario not around assumptions about the end-user.

    XML sure is terse and unweildy, no matter whether a human is used to it or not, the chances of things going wrong as a result of a "configuration error" when manually editing XML are high.

    However, in the day and age of RAD, it's wise and definitely feasible to have a UI manage and maintain the configuration file(s), XML or otherwise.
      XML sure is terse and unweildy, no matter whether a human is used to it or not, the chances of things going wrong as a result of a "configuration error" when manually editing XML are high.

      Hmmm, I think I disagree. I think with a well-written DTD, XML configs are significantly less error prone than lots of lines of name=value.

      This has got me very interested. Maybe it should be a subject for a Meditation and/or some research...

        How many humans do you know who will adhere to the strict interpretation of a DTD when modifying a configuration file? I like to think I'm pretty good with computers, and I might glance at the DTD, but I wouldn't keep it in hand.

        XML might work if it was well-formed and laid out neatly as per a custom DTD, but that's just extra hassle for the sakes of getting XML to work.

        Furthermore, I have seen some weird XML configuration files that go along the lines of this (forgive me if this isnt valid XML, it's only a crude example).
        <xml> <file1 perms="rxwrwxrwx" contents="invoices for the month of may">/pa +th/to/some/file1<file1> <file2 attributes="hidden from floor staff" expires="Mar,2007" conten +ts="company downsizing plans">/path/to/some/file2<file2> ... </xml>
        That opposed to the micro$oft .INI fmt
        [File1] File=/path/to/file1 Perms=rwxrwxrwx contents="invoices for the month of may" [File2] File=/path/to/file2 Attributes="Hidden from floor staff" Expires="Mar.2007" contents="company downsizing plans"
        The latter not only looks neater, information is easily gleaned out of it when a human reads it. Less is likely to go wrong with it too, IMO and (Tongue in cheek) it also takes up less disk/memory space. :)

        Well, I'm a fan of XML (for various reasons) if it's machine-generated and machine-read, I'd consider it in in-house config-files (as long as staff were XML-savvy), but if I wanted to save support staff the headache of dealing with an external XML-unsavvy user, I'd use .INI or something along those lines. XML is just not worth the hassle if you are going to have other people meddling about with it.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://585640]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (5)
As of 2021-02-24 18:14 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?