Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: same program different output

by Jasper (Chaplain)
on Dec 13, 2006 at 17:20 UTC ( #589625=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to same program different output

What the heck?

You're a fricking hermit here, you've posted 1700 times, and this is the best you can do?

Is this some sort of exercise in patience testing, because mine ran out with you some time ago. Anytime I see one of your posts, it's all I can do to stop myself immediately downvoting it.

If you can't think of anything to say, STOP POSTING. Please. I'm sure everyone would be helpful they felt a question was interesting or funny, or insightful. But this is just so much garbage.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://589625]
help
Chatterbox?
[choroba]: Related to the new release, anyone could explain this or this tester report?
[Discipulus]: hello crew! marto thanks for the message: but I how can I help? i'm testing cpan Padre atm problem with Client::Debug
[choroba]: I don't happen to have 5.10.0 nor 5.8.5 handy...
[Corion]: Hmm - I would say the 5.8.5 is a broken installation / corrupt tarball download, and the 5.10.0 is really weird, and maybe a bug in that version of Perl
[Corion]: I don't see how my $result = eval q{'abc' =~ ?b?}; could create a "Modification of read-only value" error
[marto]: Discipulus the issue that should be adressed is that the page needs to be updated to reflect modern perl on Windows
[Discipulus]: but is really necessary to support these ancient versions? from 5.14 onward is not enough?
[Discipulus]: yes marto I understood

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (8)
As of 2018-06-25 08:44 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?



    Results (126 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?