Clearly, yes
It's not clear to me. ;-) Why do you think it fair?
Clearly, if you took any two individuals from the
150-200 stroke range and put them together, they could not
possibly do any worse and almost certainly could shave quite
a few strokes (as you and Pete did) by combining their ideas.
Notice that TPR did not think it fair in
TPR(0,6)
(and others) where their rules stated:
There is also a special leaderboard for teams. There will be no prizes awarded to the best team, other than the admiration of your fellow golfers. If you are in a team, you can't also play individually.
Admittedly, it probably makes less difference at the sharp end of
the leaderboard. For example, though I would be honoured to pair
with Ton, I'm sure it would not improve our score one iota. :-)
Update: There is some luck involved on who you pair with. For example, pairing with pijll wouldn't have helped much because we both found the formula and both missed the symbolic reference trick. However, pijll or me pairing with Jasper or ambrus would be in the running for third place because one found the formula, the other the symref trick.
| [reply] |
| [reply] |
Ok, thanks for the clarification.
Let me try to persuade you that it's unfair
to allow pairing up, with a scenario featuring
TedYoung (since this is his node).
Ted has performed brilliantly and is delighted to have finally
strengthened his grip on third place. He is well satisified as
he sits back and surveys the leaderboard:
3rd 107 TedYoung
4th 111 jojo
5th 114 szeryf
6th 118 pijll
7th 119 Sec
8th 122 eyepopslikeamosquito
9th 125 Jasper
Then, with one hour to go, Ted almost chokes on his celebratory
beer when the leaderboard is refreshed:
3rd 104 jojo/szeryf
4th 105 pijll/Sec
5th 106 eyepopslikeamosquito/Jasper
6th 107 TedYoung
Instead of using his fist to grab his well-earned 3rd place prize
money, he is now shaking it in fury at the six golfers
who ganged up on him. :-)
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |