Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re^8: Golf Challenge: FizzBuzz

by blazar (Canon)
on Mar 03, 2007 at 21:03 UTC ( #603086=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^7: Golf Challenge: FizzBuzz
in thread Golf Challenge: FizzBuzz

I'm not saying that if all Golf and Obfu were eliminated, people would flock to Perl in the masses, but they're by far the leading candidates for discrediting Perl. It makes my job very hard.

Well I guess there's no reliable, undebatable, objective data to either confirm or disprove your claim...

And this is a bit ironic, since I invented the JAPH, so I've effectively created my own worst enemy here. {grin}

...so ++ at least for this last funny remark, if not for anything else! BTW: it's already a .sig of mine now...

(This is a rewrite of the node as it was posted in the first place, that better conveys the intended sense. The version of the node prior to the rewrite is pasted hereafter, in <spoiler> tags.)


And this is a bit ironic, since I invented the JAPH, so I've effectively created my own worst enemy here. {grin}

Well I guess there's no reliable, undebatable, objective data to either confirm or disprove your claims (which I snipped in the quote above), so ++ at least for this last funny remark, if not for anything else! BTW: it's already a .sig of mine now...

Update: thanks to a /msg from Limbic~Region I realized that my comment above may easily be misunderstood, as it happened to him: in fact it seems that I'm saying that there's no reliable, etc. data to prove that our merlyn is the JAPH inventor. But that's not what I meant, and indeed I know full well that he is universally recognized as the originator right. Apologies if I conveyed the impression that I I doubt he is because, again, I don't! What I wanted to say is that there's no reliable, etc. data to prove the (other) claims, which is why I used the plural there: in particular that "Golf and Obfu are by far the leading candidates for discrediting Perl." Shame on me for not quoting enough relevant context to begin with! I updated the above by inserting the part in parentheses, in the hope that it will make things clearer.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^9: Golf Challenge: FizzBuzz
by eyepopslikeamosquito (Chancellor) on Apr 07, 2019 at 07:51 UTC

    What I wanted to say is that there's no reliable, etc. data to prove the (other) claims, which is why I used the plural there: in particular that "Golf and Obfu are by far the leading candidates for discrediting Perl."
    Agreed. As indicated in the "Which is the Most Popular Golfing Language?" section in this node, even back in 2009, code golf was more popular in Python than Perl. The reasons for Python's rise in popularity compared to Perl may make an interesting discussion, but I doubt code golf was a factor.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://603086]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (10)
As of 2020-02-27 18:44 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    What numbers are you going to focus on primarily in 2020?










    Results (121 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?