Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Is modifying the symbol table to redefine subroutines evil?

by dewey (Pilgrim)
on Apr 11, 2007 at 22:19 UTC ( #609508=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Is modifying the symbol table to redefine subroutines evil?

I sort of like it myself-- abusable, but that's no reason to condemn it. It reminds me of make-doer in Forth (the best resource on this I've found is http://www.forthfreak.net/thinking-forth.pdf).

Update: Actually, it's more commonly called doer/make or doer-make. The overall concept is referred to as "vectored execution" in the book I linked to. Book link fixed, thanks blazar.
~dewey
  • Comment on Re: Is modifying the symbol table to redefine subroutines evil?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://609508]
help
Chatterbox?
and a log crumbles through the grate...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (5)
As of 2018-06-23 10:15 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?



    Results (125 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?