This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors.
Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.
in reply to (jptxs)Re: Perl is psychic?!
in thread Perl is psychic?!
Yes, but Perl dosen't set $& if you don't use it, and it was impossible to know that it would be used... |
Re (tilly) 3: Perl is psychic?!
by tilly (Archbishop) on Mar 06, 2001 at 01:50 UTC
|
Whoever voted down the above node completely missed the
point. MrNobo1024 is completely correct in saying that
if Perl worked as documented as far back as, say, Camel 2
then it should not have had enough information to
calculate $&. | [reply] |
|
