Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Is there a better way to call fe(get|set)round?

by toolic (Bishop)
on Jun 30, 2007 at 02:20 UTC ( [id://624157]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Is there a better way to call fe(get|set)round?

I just happened to be browsing CPAN, and I stumbled across the Number::WithError module, which is described as "Numbers with error propagation and rounding".

I honestly do not know if this will help you because I have never used this module, but it sounds promising. There are rounding and numeric comparison methods.

Good luck.

  • Comment on Re: Is there a better way to call fe(get|set)round?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Is there a better way to call fe(get|set)round?
by HollyKing (Pilgrim) on Jul 04, 2007 at 18:38 UTC
    Thanks! I have looked at Number::WithError and while a nice module it doesn't answer my question.

    Owl looked at him, and wondered whether to push him off the tree; but, feeling that he could always do it afterwards, he tried once more to find out what they were talking about.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://624157]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (7)
As of 2024-04-25 08:00 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found