Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

(redmist) Re: Profanity in the monastery

by redmist (Deacon)
on Mar 12, 2001 at 05:53 UTC ( #63714=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Profanity in the monastery

I think this idea is ludicrous. This "feature" would only waste vrooms time, and contribute further to the asinine idea that others must protect your own eyes. If you live one earth, expect to be offended. I am offended daily, but I don't care...that's life. Such is the cost of Free Speech (arguments of Prior Restraint aside).

It is the duty of the individual to deal with whatever may trouble them. If you don't like it, look the other way.

redmist
Silicon Cowboy
  • Comment on (redmist) Re: Profanity in the monastery

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: (redmist) Re: Profanity in the monastery
by little (Curate) on Mar 12, 2001 at 13:26 UTC
    Fully agree,

    even if a check for profanity might seem simple whilst comparing entered text with a list of "profanity" you won't be able to maintain the list to catch up all profanity and some does occure only in relation (e.g. "bloody" might be profanity or not). And what about "4ss"? You won't catch that. So better don't feel offended.

    Have a nice day
    All decision is left to your taste

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://63714]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (9)
As of 2019-06-25 13:54 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Is there a future for codeless software?



    Results (107 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?