Re: Can we make $& better?

[ikegami]

There is a difference:

$\ = "\n";

my $s = 'abcdefghij';
$s =~ /def/;
print $&;                                # def
print substr($s, $-[0], $+[0] - $-[0]);  # def

$s = '1234567890';
print $&;                                # def
print substr($s, $-[0], $+[0] - $-[0]);  # 456

Does it matter? Maybe. Switching could break existing code.

[Anno]

The difference you point out is even more blatant in this example:

$\ = "\n";

my $s = 'abcdefghij';
$s =~ s/def/123/;
print $&;                                # def
print substr($s, $-[0], $+[0] - $-[0]);  # 123

Some code is surely using that.

The problem with $& and friends isn't the location of the partial strings but the semantics that require copying the parts. Thus for every match, the entire string must be copied.

Anecdote:

A poster on clpmisc complained that his program "stopped working" after he introduced use English. He was matching a short pattern against some monster genome string (one or two GB) with a reasonable number of matches (some 10_000). Copying killed the cat, to coin a phrase.

Anno